Review



access arraytm system  (fluidigm)


Bioz Verified Symbol fluidigm is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol fluidigm manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    fluidigm access arraytm system
    Access Arraytm System, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1477 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/access arraytm system/product/fluidigm
    Average 96 stars, based on 1477 article reviews
    access arraytm system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    fluidigm access arraytm system
    Access Arraytm System, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/access arraytm system/product/fluidigm
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    access arraytm system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    fluidigm fluidigm access arraytm system
    Fluidigm Access Arraytm System, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fluidigm access arraytm system/product/fluidigm
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fluidigm access arraytm system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    fluidigm access arraytm technology
    Access Arraytm Technology, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/access arraytm technology/product/fluidigm
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    access arraytm technology - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    fluidigm access arraytm targeted library enrichment
    Access Arraytm Targeted Library Enrichment, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/access arraytm targeted library enrichment/product/fluidigm
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    access arraytm targeted library enrichment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    fluidigm access arraytm platform ng tas
    BAY‐ML model. (A) Visual summary of the two‐stage model. In the first stage, the longitudinal set of tumour fraction scores is modelled using the tumour and treatment features using a random effects model. In the second stage, the CT scan is predicted using the tumour fraction trend in the patient from the random effects and the tumour and treatment features. (B) Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of the dynamic predictive model described in the text (ROC = 0.74 for BAY‐ML with ctDNA info, ROC = 0.71 for BAY‐ML without ctDNA info), together with a simple model that only uses the most recent ichorCNA value. Note that the curves have been built using the maximum number of validation samples for each method. In the case of BAY‐ML models, the predictions were obtained with the last CT scan for each patient left out when the model was fit (129 CT scans). In the case of the model with only ichorCNA, 689 CT scans. The square represents our optimal threshold for 66% specificity and 75% sensitivity, using cross‐validation. The circle represents the performance of CA 15‐3 using the recommended threshold on (C) Number of true/false positives and negatives over 100 patients when the simplest threshold model (TM in the legend) and when the longitudinal ctDNA scores are considered or not into the BAY‐ML model (BAY without and BAY with in the legend). (D) Instances where the model correctly predicted progression and instances where it did not, comparing the available information at that moment. Only predictions within 90 days of the CT‐scan and where predictions are possible in both the threshold and BAY‐ML are shown. BAY‐ML, Bayesian machine learning model; CT, computed tomography; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; NGTAS, next generation‐targeted amplicon sequencing; TM, thresholding model; CA15‐3, carcinoma antigen 15‐3.
    Access Arraytm Platform Ng Tas, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/access arraytm platform ng tas/product/fluidigm
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    access arraytm platform ng tas - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    BAY‐ML model. (A) Visual summary of the two‐stage model. In the first stage, the longitudinal set of tumour fraction scores is modelled using the tumour and treatment features using a random effects model. In the second stage, the CT scan is predicted using the tumour fraction trend in the patient from the random effects and the tumour and treatment features. (B) Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of the dynamic predictive model described in the text (ROC = 0.74 for BAY‐ML with ctDNA info, ROC = 0.71 for BAY‐ML without ctDNA info), together with a simple model that only uses the most recent ichorCNA value. Note that the curves have been built using the maximum number of validation samples for each method. In the case of BAY‐ML models, the predictions were obtained with the last CT scan for each patient left out when the model was fit (129 CT scans). In the case of the model with only ichorCNA, 689 CT scans. The square represents our optimal threshold for 66% specificity and 75% sensitivity, using cross‐validation. The circle represents the performance of CA 15‐3 using the recommended threshold on (C) Number of true/false positives and negatives over 100 patients when the simplest threshold model (TM in the legend) and when the longitudinal ctDNA scores are considered or not into the BAY‐ML model (BAY without and BAY with in the legend). (D) Instances where the model correctly predicted progression and instances where it did not, comparing the available information at that moment. Only predictions within 90 days of the CT‐scan and where predictions are possible in both the threshold and BAY‐ML are shown. BAY‐ML, Bayesian machine learning model; CT, computed tomography; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; NGTAS, next generation‐targeted amplicon sequencing; TM, thresholding model; CA15‐3, carcinoma antigen 15‐3.

    Journal: Molecular Oncology

    Article Title: A large‐scale retrospective study in metastatic breast cancer patients using circulating tumour DNA and machine learning to predict treatment outcome and progression‐free survival

    doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.70015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: BAY‐ML model. (A) Visual summary of the two‐stage model. In the first stage, the longitudinal set of tumour fraction scores is modelled using the tumour and treatment features using a random effects model. In the second stage, the CT scan is predicted using the tumour fraction trend in the patient from the random effects and the tumour and treatment features. (B) Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of the dynamic predictive model described in the text (ROC = 0.74 for BAY‐ML with ctDNA info, ROC = 0.71 for BAY‐ML without ctDNA info), together with a simple model that only uses the most recent ichorCNA value. Note that the curves have been built using the maximum number of validation samples for each method. In the case of BAY‐ML models, the predictions were obtained with the last CT scan for each patient left out when the model was fit (129 CT scans). In the case of the model with only ichorCNA, 689 CT scans. The square represents our optimal threshold for 66% specificity and 75% sensitivity, using cross‐validation. The circle represents the performance of CA 15‐3 using the recommended threshold on (C) Number of true/false positives and negatives over 100 patients when the simplest threshold model (TM in the legend) and when the longitudinal ctDNA scores are considered or not into the BAY‐ML model (BAY without and BAY with in the legend). (D) Instances where the model correctly predicted progression and instances where it did not, comparing the available information at that moment. Only predictions within 90 days of the CT‐scan and where predictions are possible in both the threshold and BAY‐ML are shown. BAY‐ML, Bayesian machine learning model; CT, computed tomography; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; NGTAS, next generation‐targeted amplicon sequencing; TM, thresholding model; CA15‐3, carcinoma antigen 15‐3.

    Article Snippet: The Fluidigm Access arrayTM platform (NG‐TAS) [ ] was used to perform a triplicate target sequencing for 377 Amplicons to analyse 20 breast cancer genes.

    Techniques: Computed Tomography, Biomarker Discovery, Amplification, Sequencing